|
Post by Bashful on Nov 23, 2018 14:33:57 GMT -8
Field reports!
Posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55: Dear Cybercourtesans and Cyberwhoremongers,
Several new field reports have just been posted. Let me know if there are any bad links, and be sure and check out the "Randyboys Stud Farm" special report. I have no idea who the lady was who wrote it, but I laugh myself silly every time I read it.
Let me know if I missed any of your reports. I just discovered a report on "Mel" of The Stardust Ranch which I missed, and there was a report I got late last night which will have to wait. There was one extremely negative report that I didn't post, mainly because the author left it up to me to decide whether or not to post it. This negative report is on a girl that has no field reports, but which one frequent poster on the message board has spoken highly of. I will not tell you who she is, but if enough people here ask me to go ahead and post this negative report, I'll do it and then see what people's reactions are. I really don't know the right way to handle this. Perhaps I'll just anonymize it (delete the lady's name) and post it on the message board for comments.
There are a lot of posts from the message board that I'll be adding to the special reports section, but it could be a week or two before I've done that.
Be seeing you.
Bashful
|
|
|
Post by GS on Nov 23, 2018 14:37:20 GMT -8
post the neg. report on board
Posted by GS on December 29, 1997 at 11:20:35:In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55:I vote you post the negative field report on here. I feel that negative reports are just as important as the tons of positive reports. It paints just as realistic a picture of a party as the good ones, and its just as helpful for the new guys. Your might be right in deleting the ladies name, because this report is only one side of the story, and we don't know all the details leading up to the end result. just my humble opinion GS
|
|
Interested bystander
Guest
|
Post by Interested bystander on Nov 23, 2018 14:40:44 GMT -8
Field reports!
Posted by Interested bystander on December 29, 1997 at 11:39:49:
In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55:Yes, I think posting it on the board for comments would be the good compromise. That way it is not there permanently but we still get to see it and judge for ourselves. Personally, I would like to know the lady's name. If you delete her name would you be willing to provide it by request through e-mail? Or maybe the poster's nick?
|
|
|
Post by Pat on Nov 23, 2018 14:44:17 GMT -8
Field reports!
Posted by Pat on December 29, 1997 at 11:54:03: In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55:I think I'll go with posting it. The name part I have mixed feelings on. I think IB may have the right approach. Make it avavilable thru E-Mail. I would even be willing to send it out to who ever request it, if your are to busy to send it out yourself.
What would really be nice if their is some way to contact her and have her give a report of the party from her perspective.
Pat
|
|
|
Post by Cobb on Nov 23, 2018 14:48:28 GMT -8
My suggestion !!
Posted by Cobb on December 29, 1997 at 12:24:45:In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55:Bashful, How about an email with the report to the frequent poster who speaks highly of her ? Ask his opinion. May you are trying to save the feelings of the frequent poster also !!
Cobb Cobbmtn1@aol.com
|
|
|
Post by Treadhead on Nov 23, 2018 14:51:33 GMT -8
Field reports!
Posted by Treadhead on December 29, 1997 at 12:34:33:
In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55:The only problem regarding the negative report is that you are only getting one perspective...that of the client.
You are dealing with people's feelings here, not to mention the lady's livelihood.
I'd recommend either not posting it, or if you do, changing the lady's name.
Just my two cents worth.
Treadhead
|
|
|
Post by Coconut on Nov 23, 2018 14:54:24 GMT -8
Field Reports!
Posted by Coconut on December 29, 1997 at 13:39:22:
In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55: I agree, post with eMail for name, or maybe ask the reporter to answer eMail requests for the name. At least post the report anonymously.
Thanks, Coconut
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Nov 23, 2018 14:59:04 GMT -8
Field reports!
Posted by Doc on December 29, 1997 at 14:12:00:
In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55: Bash,
As you know I have previously argued against the posting of negative reports. I don't want to go into all the details again ... but I will summarize.
First, I am most definitely consumer-oriented when it comes to writing about commercial sex. I am not trying to promote or protect service providers. What I've learned about commercial sex I have learned from experience, and believe me, I am no protector or defender of bad attitudes and bad service.
However, my experience has taught me that the quality of a party is substantially dependent on the man, not the woman. It is the man who arrives in whatever mood he is in; chooses the lady; articulates, or fails to articulate, exactly what he wants; participates in the party; and leaves with whatever experience he had.
To blame it all on the other person is not reasonable. Even if she is the world's biggest attitude queen, why did you choose her? What mysterious self-destructive path in your own brain led you to her? That, to me, is a much more interesting and productive area for you to focus on, rather than just saying that she is a bad service provider.
It's your money and your experience. You have to learn how to handle yourself in a brothel, not just blame the service providers.
When we go to a brothel, we are just there to play and have fun. For a woman, it is her livelihood. So I say, you should bear a bad party with grace; learn your lesson; and move on.
Doc doc@cyberpass.net
|
|
Interested bystander
Guest
|
Post by Interested bystander on Nov 23, 2018 15:03:16 GMT -8
But Doc....
Posted by Interested bystander on December 29, 1997 at 14:50:28:
In Reply to: Re: Field reports! posted by Doc on December 29, 1997 at 14:12:00:Hi Doc,
You and I have had this discussion before so I will not attempt to rehash it either. In this case what we are attempting to get is the post on the message board (sans name if necessary) to judge for ourselves what the problems were. It would also help if we could get a rebuttal from the lady herself (also anonymous if necessary). Bashful says it is a lady who has been highly talked about by a regular poster. Who knows it may be my favorite lady, or yours, or Flyfishers, etc. I for one would like to see how bad it is. Bashful has posted negative reports before in the field report section (some of them very negative), what is so different about this one?
Another side to this is credibility. We have been accused of being an advertising site for the working girls of Nevada and not being honest about what can and does happen at brothels. This is a chance to show the dirty underbelly of visiting brothels and maybe getting both sides of a story.
OK, the serious stuff is over. Sherry, XXX, Klatch, you are now free to discuss dirty underbellies to your hearts content.
|
|
|
Post by OC John on Nov 23, 2018 15:16:19 GMT -8
Negative Field Report
Posted by OC John on December 29, 1997 at 14:45:18:
In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55: If the report was prepared by someone we know and respect, then I think it should be posted but if it has been sent to you by an unknown person or one of the "lurkers" then I think it should not be posted just to protect the integrity of the field reports and giving the benefit of the doubt to the lady.
I do think we need to be cautious on posting negative field reports. As some one said, it is their livelihood.
Thanks for listening.
|
|
|
Post by Outdate Dave on Nov 23, 2018 15:19:42 GMT -8
Post without ladies name.
Posted by Outdate Dave on December 29, 1997 at 16:53:05:
In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55: I vote for posting without the ladies name. I would like to hear how other guys got ripped off. One outdate I had for 24 hours ended before getting to the Peppermill from MR1 because she was a non-stop talker and a "born again lady" who tried to convert me.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Nov 23, 2018 15:24:27 GMT -8
Post without ladies name.
Posted by Doc on December 29, 1997 at 17:00:28:
In Reply to: Post without ladies name. posted by Outdate Dave on December 29, 1997 at 16:53:05: You should have put something in her mouth.
Oh hell I shouldn't post crude stuff like that, I'm just channeling Buffy again.
Doc doc@cyberpass.net
|
|
|
Post by trecksworth on Nov 23, 2018 15:27:15 GMT -8
my vote is for posting
Posted by trecksworth on December 29, 1997 at 17:08:01:
In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55: my vote is for posting with or without her name i do not understand or agree with the opinion of not posting negative reports but i do agree everyone is entitled to their opinion
|
|
|
Post by Dick Long on Nov 23, 2018 15:30:19 GMT -8
Field reports!
Posted by Dick Long on December 29, 1997 at 18:30:42:
In Reply to: Field reports! posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 11:08:55: Bashful
By not posting negative reports you are creating an invalid and unrealistic scale for others to base decisions upon. Someone reading the reports cold would be certain to believe that it is all great, occasionally there are bad experiences. I'd put a number of about 30% to it, and I am really sure that any contribution I made to the bad experience was merely in response to the atrocious behaviour I was dealing with, such as changing the deal to "I don't do that" after making an agreement and paying. This needs to be out there for accuracy's sake.
Don't be a weenie and only post the good. It makes you look as if you are in cahoots with the girls or are getting freebies to post only positives. Is that the case? It sure looks like it to an outsider.
DL
|
|
|
Post by Bashful on Nov 23, 2018 15:34:25 GMT -8
Field reports!
Posted by Bashful on December 29, 1959 at 18:54:52:
In Reply to: Re: Field reports! posted by Dick Long on December 29, 1997 at 18:30:42:No.
Be seeing you.
Bashful
|
|