|
Post by Fingir on Nov 18, 2018 13:03:20 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by Fingir on December 20, 1997 at 05:26:06:Has anyone booked a party with a lady, sight unseen, based only on field reports? Was it a sucessful party? Do we read into field reports things we want to find? Personally, I find some of the reports irresistable. I get, gosh, carried away.
|
|
|
Post by Pat on Nov 18, 2018 13:06:56 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by Pat on December 20, 1997 at 11:01:07:In Reply to: field reports vs success posted by Fingir on December 20, 1997 at 05:26:06:F ield reports are good for helping you get familiar with the different ladies working at various houses. If you are into a particular type of lady,Short,Tall,or big chested it gives you a starting point. DO NOT, I repeat DO NOt, take field reports has the gospel trueth. They are only one persons opinion of a lady. We all see things from different eyes.
I have had some very good luck by using the reports to find certain ladies. 2 of my most resent parties were picked by field reports. I went looking for these ladies and they were pretty much just like the report had discribed. I have also looked up ladies from the reports and found what the report writer wrote about a lady's beauty was not the way I saw her.
Bottom line use them for guidance, but make your own judgements when you meet the ladies of a report.
Pat
|
|
|
Post by OC John on Nov 18, 2018 13:10:45 GMT -8
Field Reports Are A Great Starting Point
Posted by OC John on December 20, 1997 at 12:21:51:In Reply to: Re: field reports vs success posted by Pat on December 20, 1997 at 11:01:07:Pat, I agree with you. The field reports are only a starting point.
When I go to Nevada, I usually print out the page that has reports by brothel with the names of the ladies. I do this for any brothel I might go to and make comments next to the ladies names. I take special care to note mediocre or negative reports or items in the reports that especially appealed to me.
|
|
Interested bystander
Guest
|
Post by Interested bystander on Nov 18, 2018 13:16:36 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by Interested bystander on December 20, 1997 at 11:33:40:In Reply to: field reports vs success posted by Fingir on December 20, 1997 at 05:26:06:I agree with Pat, look at the field reports and make a list of possibilities but decide after talking to the ladies. I arranged a party with a board regular based solely on her posts and had a fantastic time but I think her posts told me a lot more about the person than field reports do.
|
|
|
Post by GEONW97 on Nov 18, 2018 13:27:12 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by GEONW97 on December 20, 1997 at 14:47:43: In Reply to: field reports vs success posted by Fingir on December 20, 1997 at 05:26:06:On my last trip down, I met a lady who had solid field reports, and decided to party with her based upon her reputation. I would consider the party very good.
Now would I book the party in advance, without at least meeting her first? I am not sure about that one. One of the problems of booking in advance is that it hurts your negotiating position. That one is up to you.
|
|
|
Post by Fingir on Nov 18, 2018 13:30:22 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by Fingir on December 21, 1997 at 04:06:15:In Reply to: Re: field reports vs success posted by GEONW97 on December 20, 1997 at 14:47:43: I've wondered about how the fee was arrived at for a pre-arranged appointment. It would seem kind of cheesy to make an appointment, and then back out because you didn't like the terms.
I'm also concerned that saying something like "Hi. I read your field reports on GP's message board and I'd like to strike a deal" would be kind of like pasting a dollar sign on my head.
|
|
|
Post by GEONW97 on Nov 18, 2018 13:34:28 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by GEONW97 on December 21, 1997 at 16:17:43:In Reply to: Re: field reports vs success posted by Fingir on December 21, 1997 at 04:06:15:I usually don't even mention the source of my information, only that a friend recommended you.
I won't lie, if a lady asks me if I have seen bashful's (or GP's) web site, I won't deny it. But there is no need to go into any detail, either.
I will ask after the party if the lady would give me permission to write a field report. If I had a good party, I want to maintain a decent working relationship with her, and don't want her ticked for having a report written on her.
|
|
|
Post by Klatch on Nov 18, 2018 14:29:06 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by Klatch on December 20, 1997 at 15:08:49:In Reply to: field reports vs success posted by Fingir on December 20, 1997 at 05:26:06:Consider the field reports to be a kind of scouting report. They contain excellent information however can be very slanted by the reporter's perspective.
One of the "regulars" here that I respect posted a positive report on a lady that I would tell you gave me my most dis-satisfying party ever. We have agreed to disagree on her. Another lady that we have both partied with was found to be excellent by both of us.
Remember that there are no sure things. If you really want to make pre-arrangements your safest bet would be those ladies that have the most positive reports (e.g. Katherine, Tamara)however they do seem at the upper end of the pay scale.
Simply walking in and doing some socalizing to meet a lady that seems compatible prior to partying may well be your best insurance of an enjoyable experience. My best guess is that 95 or more percent of the parties made this way will prove very satisfying.
Klatch
|
|
|
Post by Omerta on Nov 18, 2018 14:35:24 GMT -8
Yes & no
Posted by Omerta on December 20, 1997 at 19:24:13:
In Reply to: field reports vs success posted by Fingir on December 20, 1997 at 05:26:06:I never booked appointments, but two out of the three ladies I partied with have had positive trip reports on them. Both parties went as good as to be expected.
Trip reports are very subjective since they are usually written during the afterglow. Most are accurate, but I recommend that they be used as guidelines and nothing more.
O.
|
|
|
Post by Dopey on Nov 18, 2018 14:38:46 GMT -8
I agree with Big O
Posted by Dopey on December 20, 1997 at 20:14:36:In Reply to: Yes & no posted by Omerta on December 20, 1997 at 19:24:13:I went looking for Shanice of MR1 based on Big O's field report...He was right about her :-) That was my only party experience with a field reported lady. On that same trip, I met many of the ladies that had field reports or recommendations from other guys. Some were very attractive, and to my surprise, I thought a couple of them were not all that physically attractive,(ok I admit it, I'm superficial) so it depends on what you're personal preferences are.
D.
|
|
|
Post by Renegade on Nov 18, 2018 14:42:08 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by Renegade on December 20, 1997 at 20:19:14: In Reply to: field reports vs success posted by Fingir on December 20, 1997 at 05:26:06:YES! Well Sort-of. Before making my first trip, I went through most of the field reports. When I got to the house, one of the ladies introduced herself. I recognized the name, and made my decision. I did not regret it. She was everything the reports said and more.
|
|
|
Post by TG on Nov 18, 2018 14:45:30 GMT -8
field reports vs success
Posted by TG on December 21, 1997 at 02:31:35: In Reply to: field reports vs success posted by Fingir on December 20, 1997 at 05:26:06:I have had great sucess with meetings based on field reports. That is how I met the most beautiful Hollywood and the absolute best Lady K. I couldn't have asked for any better!!!
TG
|
|